Comparison Table
| Feature | Suzuki Swift 2018 1.3 | Honda Fit GK3 2013 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Inline 4-Cylinder DOHC | Inline 4-Cylinder DOHC i-VTEC |
| Displacement | 1.3 liters | 1.3 liters |
| Power | 91 HP @ 6000 rpm | 100 HP @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 99 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 119 Nm @ 5000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-speed manual or CVT |
| Fuel Efficiency | Approximately 5.5-6.0 L/100 km | Approximately 5.0-5.5 L/100 km |
| Dimensions (L x W x H) | 4095 mm x 1590 mm x 1380 mm | 3955 mm x 1695 mm x 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2365 mm | 2530 mm |
| Weight | 830 kg | 1000 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 passengers | 5 passengers |
| Cargo Space | 265 Liters | 380 liters -Spacious, with Magic Seat flexibility |
| Safety Features | ABS, airbags, stability control | ABS, airbags, stability control |
| Starting Price | Approximately $990 – $1,680 | Approximately $880 – $4,240 |
Key Differences:
- Power and Torque: The Honda Fit has a significantly more powerful engine with higher torque.
- Transmission Options: The Honda Fit offers both manual and CVT options, while the Suzuki Swift only offers a manual transmission.
- Dimensions: The Honda Fit is slightly shorter in length but wider and taller compared to the Suzuki Swift.
- Weight: The Honda Fit is heavier than the Suzuki Swift.
- Fuel Efficiency: The Honda Fit tends to have slightly better fuel efficiency.
- Interior Space: The Honda Fit’s Magic Seat system provides greater flexibility and cargo space compared to the Suzuki Swift.
Both cars have their unique strengths, with the Suzuki Swift being a lighter and more compact option, while the Honda Fit offers more power and interior versatility.
Long-Term Use Comparison Table
| Feature | Suzuki Swift 2018 1.3 | Honda Fit GK3 2013 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | Known for reliability with few common issues. Regular maintenance is key. | Highly reliable with a strong reputation for durability. |
| Maintenance Costs | Generally low, affordable parts and service costs. | Relatively low maintenance costs, similar to Swift. |
| Comfort | Comfortable ride, though rear seats might feel cramped for some. | Spacious interior with versatile seating arrangements. |
| Fuel Efficiency | Good fuel efficiency, economical for long-term use. | Excellent fuel efficiency, beneficial for long-term savings. |
| Resale Value | Holds value well, good for future resale. | Retains value well, making it a solid investment. |
| Interior Versatility | Moderate cargo space. | High cargo space with Magic Seat flexibility. |
| Engine Longevity | Reliable engine with proper care. | Robust engine known for longevity. |
| Parts Availability | Widely available parts, easy to find. | Parts readily available, especially in major markets. |
| Depreciation | Moderate depreciation over time. | Slower depreciation, holds value better. |
| Comfort for Long Drives | Comfortable for city and highway drives. | Very comfortable for long trips due to spacious interior. |
Key Takeaways:
- Reliability: Both cars are known for their reliability, but the Honda Fit’s reputation for durability is particularly strong.
- Maintenance Costs: Both have low maintenance costs, making them economical for long-term ownership.
- Comfort: The Honda Fit has an edge in comfort due to its spacious and versatile interior.
- Fuel Efficiency: Both vehicles offer good to excellent fuel efficiency, which helps in reducing long-term costs.
- Resale Value: Both hold their value well, but the Honda Fit tends to depreciate more slowly.
Both the Suzuki Swift 2018 1.3 and the Honda Fit GK3 2013 1.3 are excellent choices for long-term use.
Conclusion
Both the Suzuki Swift 2018 1.3 and the Honda Fit GK3 2013 1.3 are excellent choices for long-term use, offering reliability, low maintenance costs, and good fuel efficiency. The Fit has the edge in interior space and versatility, while the Swift is slightly more compact and sporty.
NOTE : The information provided here is collected from the internet and may vary from actual specifications. Please verify with official sources for the most accurate details. Thank you for your understanding.