Overview: In the realm of compact cars, the 2010 Honda Fit and Toyota Vitz are standout models offering versatility and efficiency. The Honda Fit is noted for its spacious interior, thanks to the innovative Magic Seat system, and a fuel-efficient 1.3L engine. The Toyota Vitz, known for reliability, features a compact design and a 1.3L engine, prioritizing fuel savings.
Performance: The Honda Fit’s 1.3L engine delivers 99 horsepower, while the Toyota Vitz’s 1.3L engine provides 99 horsepower. Both offer excellent fuel economy, with the Fit at 28 mpg city / 35 mpg highway, and the Vitz at 29 mpg city / 36 mpg highway.
Interior Comfort: The Fit’s Magic Seat system allows for various cargo configurations, maximizing space. Both cars come with essential infotainment features and robust safety systems, with the Fit slightly edging out in passenger protection.
Price and Value: The Honda Fit starts around $15,000, slightly higher than the Vitz at $13,000. Despite the higher price, the Fit offers better cargo space and reliability, potentially leading to higher resale value. The Vitz excels in fuel economy, offering significant long-term savings.
Engine Specifications
| Feature | Honda Fit 2010 1.3L | Toyota Vitz 2010 1.3L |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Inline 4-Cylinder | Inline 4-Cylinder |
| Displacement | 1.3 liters (1339 cc) | 1.3 liters (1298 cc) |
| Power | 99 HP @ 6000 rpm | 94 HP @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 127 Nm @ 6000 rpm | 121 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel System | Honda PGM-Fuel Injection | Toyota D-4 Injection |
Performance and Efficiency
| Feature | Honda Fit 2010 1.3L | Toyota Vitz 2010 1.3L |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission | 5-speed Manual / CVT | 5-speed Manual / CVT |
| Drive Type | Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) | Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) |
| Fuel Efficiency | 28 mpg city / 35 mpg highway | 29 -mpg city / 36 -mpg highway |
| CO2 Emissions | 97 g/km | 99 g/km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 11.1 gallons (42 liters) | 10.6 gallons (40 liters) |
Interior and Comfort
| Feature | Honda Fit 2010 1.3L | Toyota Vitz 2010 1.3L |
|---|---|---|
| Seating Capacity | 5 passengers | 5 passengers |
| Cargo Space | Up to 1205 liters (with Magic Seat) | 309 liters |
| Interior Features | Magic Seat, USB ports, Manual seats | CD Player, USB ports, Manual seats |
Safety and Build Quality
| Feature | Honda Fit 2010 1.3L | Toyota Vitz 2010 1.3L |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Features | 6 airbags, ABS, Vehicle Stability Control | 2 airbags, ABS, Vehicle Stability Control |
| Build Quality | High-quality materials, durable interior | High-quality materials, durable interior |
Price and Value for Money
| Feature | Honda Fit 2010 1.3L | Toyota Vitz 2010 1.3L |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Approximately US Dollar $15,000 | Approximately US Dollar $13,000 |
| Maintenance Costs | ( all parts are available in Myanmar and cheap) | ( all parts are available in Myanmar and cheap) |
| Resale Value | More Prominent small car in Myanmar.In Myanmar, Toyota Resale value is higher than other | Internationally slightly lower than Honda.In Myanmar Toyota Resale value is higher than other |
Both engines are quite similar in terms of displacement and power, but the Honda Fit 1.3 has a slight edge in horsepower and torque. The Honda also has a slightly larger fuel tank and lower CO2 emissions.
2010 Honda Fit 1.3
- Reliability: The Honda Fit is known for its reliability and longevity. Owners often report high satisfaction with the vehicle’s performance over many years.
- Maintenance Costs: Generally, Honda vehicles have lower maintenance costs due to their robust engineering and widespread availability of parts.
- Fuel Efficiency: The Fit offers good fuel efficiency, averaging around 28 mpg city / 35 mpg highway, which helps in reducing long-term running costs.
- Build Quality: Honda’s build quality is usually excellent, with durable materials used in both the interior and exterior, contributing to a longer lifespan.
2010 Toyota Vitz
- Reliability: Toyota has a strong reputation for reliability, and the Vitz is no exception. Many owners experience trouble-free operation for years.
- Maintenance Costs: Maintenance costs for the Vitz are typically low, similar to the Fit, with parts and service being readily available and affordable.
- Fuel Efficiency: The Vitz excels in fuel efficiency, achieving around 29 mpg city / 36 mpg highway, which is slightly better than the Fit, contributing to lower fuel costs over time.
- Build Quality: Toyota also uses high-quality materials, and the Vitz is known for its solid construction and durability.
Long-Term Performance
- Reliability: Both cars are known for their reliability and long-lasting performance.
- Fuel Efficiency: Toyota Vitz has a slight edge in fuel efficiency.
- Resale Value: Internationally Honda Fit often has a higher resale value due to brand recognition.
- Comfort and Features: Honda Fit’s Magic Seat system offers more versatility in cargo space.
Conclusion
Both the 2010 Honda Fit 1.3 and the 2010 Toyota Vitz are excellent choices for long-term use. The decision may come down to personal preference, specific feature needs, and brand loyalty. If you prioritize fuel efficiency and slightly lower initial costs, the Toyota Vitz might be the better choice. However, if you value versatility, and slightly better performance, the Honda Fit will be your choice. In Myanmar TOYOTA Resale value is higher than if compared with other car brands.
Writer Perspective: If we compare Honda Fit 2010 and Vitz 2010 . Honda Fit has more variety of interior systems ( better and more modernized over the Vitz)
You are invited to FORUM to Discuss This, CLICK FORUM LINK
NOTE : The information provided here is collected from the internet and may vary from actual specifications. Please verify with official sources for the most accurate details. Thank you for your understanding.